ST0825 · DevOps Engineer L4 · AM2
KSB Tracker
20 KSBs across 8 themes, grouped into 4 stages. Each row shows whether it can be written from research alone, needs a real workplace example, or both — plus a notes field for ideas as they come to you. See the Apprenticeship hub for the wider timeline, retro diary, and career development.
Enter the same key on another device (e.g. your work computer) to share this tracker's progress between them. This is a shared secret, not a login — anyone with the key can read or change this data, so don't reuse a real password.
Stage 0
In progress Data Ethics · Tooling and Technology| KSB | Ask | Type | Notes | Drafted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Ethics | ||||
| K3 | GDPR / DPA / AI ethics Plus a light "how I apply this" reflection at the end. How to use data ethically and the implications for wider society, with respect to the use of data, automation and artificial intelligence within the context of relevant data protection policy and legislation. | Research-led | ||
| What each KSB means K3 What this means: The Data Protection Act, Computer Misuse Act, and GDPR are examples of legislation you may be bound by. Include your company's AI policy — why they have it and what to consider if you're able to use it. Example evidence: Identify and explain the legislation relevant to your role, with examples of how you've complied with it and how it's affected your work. Mention obligations on you and the company in the event of a data breach, and the ever-changing landscape as technology develops. Mock discussion questions — Pass
| ||||
| Tooling and Technology | ||||
| K24 | SaaS v bespoke v enterprise, informed choice Definitions = research. Applying it to your team's real decisions = example. The difference between Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) v bespoke v enterprise tooling and how to make an informed choice that suits each use case. | Mixed | ||
| Distinction criteria — Tooling and Technology Justifies their choice of tooling and the potential impact of making an alternative choice, explaining the cause and effect of making the wrong decision. What each KSB means K24 What this means: Define the types of implementations. Look at the assessment criteria for what to compare — compare each paired type against the other and what they offer uniquely. Provide pros and cons for each. Relate what you write to the tools used in your workplace. Example evidence: Can be done using a table. For distinction, use the comparison to select the most appropriate implementation for your company's needs, and explore the outcomes if the wrong decision had been made (time or financial impact). Mock discussion questions — Pass
Mock discussion questions — Distinction
| ||||
| Stage notes — Stage 0 | ||||
Stage 1
Not started Organisational Culture · The Profession in Context| KSB | Ask | Type | Notes | Drafted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organisational Culture | ||||
| K9 | Org cultures / frameworks, complement vs. constrain Different organisational cultures, the development frameworks utilised and how they can both complement each other and introduce constraints on delivery. | Mixed | ||
| K23 | Blameless culture & continual improvement Strengthened by a light example. The importance of continual improvement within a blameless culture. | Research-led | ||
| S2 | Work within different org cultures Work within different organisational cultures with both internal and external parties. | Example-only | ||
| Distinction criteria — Organisational Culture Explains the mindsets that underpin organisational culture — e.g. outcome versus activity driven, collaboration versus silos, accountability, trust and empowerment — and their impact on the organisation. Assesses the difference between risk avoidance and risk acceptance and how these link to culture. What each KSB means K9 What this means: How different teams within your organisation manage their work differently — other parts of the organisation are unlikely to be in agile teams. How will you work effectively with those parts of the company? Consider outcome-driven vs activity-driven, or silo vs collaborative culture. Example evidence: Examples of the various organisational cultures at your company (company values and how they shape culture), the development frameworks available and used. Then analyse the pros/cons of these different cultures. K23 What this means: Continual improvement here relates to CPD and links to Theme 6. Can also be demonstrated by being given room to explore solutions with acceptance that what you produce might not work out. Example evidence: Cover the blameless culture element with examples of support the company gave you while learning — your experience at the start of placement and the steps employers took to help you settle. S2 What this means: Within a DevOps team there's usually a prominent DevOps-based culture (collaboration, blameless, iteratively improving). Outside the immediate team there will be differing cultures and mindsets, even within the same organisation. Example evidence: Examples of working within different teams and the differences you've experienced: methodology (Agile), tools and tech, mindsets (outcome-driven, collaboration, silo etc.). External parties can mean outside your usual team, not necessarily outside the organisation. Mock discussion questions — Pass
Mock discussion questions — Distinction
| ||||
| Theme notes — Organisational Culture | ||||
| The Profession in Context | ||||
| K18 | Multidisciplinary roles + interfaces Map the generic roles onto your actual team. Roles within a multidisciplinary team and the interfaces with other areas of an organisation. | Mixed | ||
| K19 | Comms methods, choosing the right one Different methods of communication and choosing the appropriate one - e.g. face-to-face (synchronous, high bandwidth), instant messaging, email (asynchronous, low bandwidth), visualisations vs. words. | Mixed | ||
| K22 | Occupation in digital landscape + regulation How their occupation fits into the wider digital landscape and any current or future regulatory requirements. | Research-led | ||
| S8 | Flexible / collaborative / pragmatic delivery Work in agile, multi-disciplinary delivery teams, taking a flexible, collaborative and pragmatic approach to delivering tasks. | Example-only | ||
| B4 | Inclusive, professional, blameless Is inclusive, professional and maintains a blameless culture. | Example-only | ||
| What each KSB means K18 What this means: The nuances of working within a multidisciplinary team — individuals with differing roles/specialisms, e.g. DevOps engineers, a project manager, a software developer, a QA. Example evidence: Details about each team member's role and responsibilities, how each role interacts with other parts of the organisation. A team chart and job role breakdown helps. Also cover examples of discussion/collaboration with other teams (links with S2). K19 What this means: A key thing to note is 'visualised' comms — data sent with charts or diagrams. Example evidence: Outline 3-4 different communication methods, the scenario for each, and why that method was most appropriate. Ideally accompany each with visual evidence (screenshots). K22 What this means: First part covered by K18, second by K3 (reference those sections). Bring forward a regulatory requirement specific to your company's industry. A future regulatory requirement isn't required if none is upcoming, but research it — it could come up in the professional discussion. Example evidence: Legal, insurance-based, data usage and collection-oriented considerations. S8 What this means: Agile is the methodology most used within DevOps teams and best fits the DevOps approach. How tasks are completed in line with this methodology and its steps is the key part. Example evidence: Use the STAR method to detail how a task was completed. Include screenshots of the ticket (Jira, Trello etc.). Your specific contribution to the agile methodology — stand-ups, retros etc. Include how you were collaborative and flexible. B4 What this means: Expects collaboration with a range of people, across roles, internally and externally, valuing inclusion & diversity, and exercising good judgment on ethical/legal/regulatory matters. Example evidence: An example of acting inclusively and supporting a colleague. The professional element can be covered holistically with Theme 4 overall. Mock discussion questions — Pass
| ||||
| Theme notes — The Profession in Context | ||||
Stage 2
Not started Continuous Learning & Development · Peer Review| KSB | Ask | Type | Notes | Drafted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous Learning & Development | ||||
| K25 | Cloud certification awareness Research the cert paths; your own progress is ongoing and personal. Maintain an awareness of cloud certification requirements. | Mixed | ||
| S16 | Invest in own + others' learning Invest in continuous learning, both your own development and others, ensuring learning activities dovetail with changing job requirements. Keep up with cutting edge. | Example-only | ||
| B2 | Invests time in own development Invests time and effort in their own development, recognising that technology evolves at a rapid rate. | Example-only | ||
| Distinction criteria — Continuous Learning & Development Gives examples of how their CPD has had a positive impact on theirs and their team's work. Explains how this has helped them perform their role better and make better technology choices. What each KSB means K25 What this means: List available certifications, compare them against each other and what they offer uniquely, with pros and cons for each. Example evidence: A knowledge focus so detail matters — relate the pros/cons to your role, could be a table. If you've undertaken certifications, include evidence and explain why that certification was chosen. S16 What this means: Explain the company's CPD values and encouragement, then expand on K25 with justification for why you undertook certain certifications/training (benefit to yourself and the business). Example evidence: See B2 for your own learning. How have you aided colleagues' development? E.g. leading a pair programming session, running a demo on internal systems for an unfamiliar colleague, advising on certification/training. B2 What this means: Ensure examples of CPD aren't just from a single period (start of apprenticeship) — learning should be continuous throughout placement. Example evidence: How you keep up with industry changes in your spare time. How your employer informs you of technology changes (e.g. AWS, Azure) applied in the work environment. Details of employer-recommended CPD. Evidence of certifications and training is ideal. Mock discussion questions — Pass
Mock discussion questions — Distinction
| ||||
| Theme notes — Continuous Learning & Development | ||||
| Peer Review | ||||
| K20 | Pair / mob techniques, when to use each Pair/mob programming techniques and when to use each technique. | Mixed | ||
| S13 | Engage in productive pair / mob programming Engage in productive pair/mob programming. | Example-only | ||
| What each KSB means K20 What this means: Show appreciation of different pair and mobbing techniques — explain several and the scenarios they should be applied in. Example evidence: Identify and describe 2-3 different pair/mobbing techniques, examples of when each would be most appropriate, and the benefit to code quality. S13 What this means: Application of the K20 knowledge — write up projects where you used pair/mob programming and describe the technique and where it was used. Example evidence: A few examples completing a programming task using one of the K20 techniques. Outline your contribution using the STAR method. Mock discussion questions — Pass
| ||||
| Theme notes — Peer Review | ||||
Stage 3
Not started Problem Solving · Communicating & Knowledge Sharing| KSB | Ask | Type | Notes | Drafted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Problem Solving | ||||
| K6 | Problem-solving techniques Affinity mapping, impact maps, PDCA / Deming. A range of problem solving techniques appropriate to the task at hand, such as affinity mapping, impact maps, plan-do-check-act/Deming. | Mixed | ||
| S21 | Lightweight modelling to gain consensus Application of lightweight modelling techniques, such as whiteboarding, in order to gain consensus as a team on evolving architecture. | Example-only | ||
| Distinction criteria — Problem Solving Describes how they facilitated an incident post-mortem / lessons-learned session. Explains the root cause analysis process, and gains consensus on an improvement plan including accountabilities and the implementation timeline. What each KSB means K6 What this means: Showing knowledge of a variety of problem-solving techniques — the examples given in the KSB (affinity mapping, impact maps, PDCA/Deming) are good ones to explain. Example evidence: Identify and describe 3-4 problem-solving techniques, with examples of when each would be most appropriate for a given task. S21 What this means: An extension of K6 — provide examples of when you used these techniques and the outcomes reached. Example evidence: Examples within projects where you applied modelling techniques for your team's work. Whiteboarding is easiest to evidence diagrammatically. Mention your company's root cause analysis process (how the problem came about, steps to duplicate it) and the potential solutions. Cover communication with the team and how you agreed a plan of action to resolve and prevent recurrence. Mock discussion questions — Pass
Mock discussion questions — Distinction
| ||||
| Theme notes — Problem Solving | ||||
| Communicating & Knowledge Sharing | ||||
| S1 | Communicate credibly, Show & Tell Communicate credibly with technical and non-technical people at all levels, using a range of methods; e.g. 'Show and Tell' and 'Demonstrations'. | Example-only | ||
| S4 | Initiate knowledge sharing Initiate and facilitate knowledge sharing and technical collaboration. | Example-only | ||
| B1 | Enthusiasm / openness / collaboration Exhibits enthusiasm, openness and an aptitude for working as part of a collaborative community; e.g. sharing best practice, pairing with team members, learning from others and engaging in peer review practices. | Example-only | ||
| What each KSB means S1 What this means: How you've taken the lead discussing with technical colleagues and non-technical colleagues (project manager, business analyst etc.). Example evidence: Show the difference in approach (acronyms/jargon with tech people, simplified with non-tech). How did you communicate when you had to remove technical detail — abstraction, analogy, diagrams? Cover both show-and-tells and demonstrations. S4 What this means: Collaboration is a DevOps principle — explore it through pairing, mobbing, mentoring, shadowing, show and tell (not limited to these). Example evidence: The keyword is initiate — be proactive in volunteering or arranging the session. A screenshot of an invite to a session you ran is good evidence. Lunch and learns work well. B1 What this means: Shows your professional attitude to work — apparent in the language you use and the obstacles you face and overcome. Example evidence: Evidence for other KSBs in this theme may also suit this one. Theme 7 (sharing best practices, pairing, learning from others, peer review) also applies. Enthusiasm can be evidenced via your S4 initiation/facilitation, or by discussing peer-reviewed commits signed off before being committed to the pipeline. Mock discussion questions — Pass
| ||||
| Theme notes — Communicating & Knowledge Sharing | ||||